FPA Diversity and Position Statements
Diversity Statement
FPA welcomes members of all faiths and religious backgrounds, people of all races, ethnicities, national origins, immigration statuses, gender identities, socioeconomic statuses, physical or mental statuses, sexual or affectional orientations, or political beliefs. To this end, FPA commits to multiculturalism and to ensure on-going cultural competence and effectiveness as educators, researchers, consultants, administrators, policymakers, and practitioners. Additionally, FPA is committed to upholding the American Psychological Association Ethical Guidelines which make clear the importance of advocating for the culturally competent practice of psychology. We strive to:
- Create a positive environment that allows psychologists to learn and explore issues of stereotyping, prejudice and mistreatment of minority groups in order to increase cultural competence for all members of FPA; for this purpose, we pay attention to ensure that psychologists have access to and participate in specific diversity and cultural competence continuing education and experiential workshops at local, regional and state events.
- Uphold APA Guidelines that make it clear that we as psychologists must advocate for and protect the civil rights of others, which informs our commitment to engage in advocacy and psychoeducational commentary on social issues such as mental health care access for underserved populations, violence, and women's and minority issues.
- Address recruitment and retention of psychologists from diverse backgrounds as members of FPA in an on-going basis through the collaboration between our Board of Directors, Executive Committee, Diversity and Cultural Competence Committee, continuing education processes, and our regional Chapters.
Position Statements
FPA has charged the Social Justice Committee (SJC) with maintaining a pulse on social issues that impact the work of psychologists. The SJC seeks consensus in addressing and publishing position statements for FPA and more broadly the practitioners, graduate students, and clients/patients served by Florida psychologists. The SJC endeavors to remain true to positive social change and writes responses informed by peer-reviewed, evidence-based, and sound research.
Other entities within FPA may also submit position statements for consideration.
The FPA Board of Directors shall be responsible for deciding when and in what form such a public comment on policy should be made.
The mission of the SJC serves to increase awareness of and advocate for equality and justice among members and the community through:
- Promoting values of beneficence and non-maleficence within the context of intersectional privilege
- Sharing accountability for demonstrating respect of individual rights and dignity with integrity
- Decreasing mental health disparities among marginalized population is Florida
- Increasing psychologists' cultural competence via educational opportunities
- Conducting and disseminating research with practical treatment recommendations to improve mental health outcomes for oppressed groups
- Enabling psychologists to understand the current cultural and diversity factors surrounding social justice issues and take appropriate action to voice their concerns
An Open Letter of Support for LGBTQ+ Youth from Educational and Mental Health Professionals
FPA Opposes Modification of the AP Psychology Course (August 8, 2023)
Freedom from School Violence (June 2023)
The Florida Psychological Association (FPA) supports the American Psychological Association’s recommendations for freedom from school violence through an evidence-based, public health approach.
Police Brutality (February 2023)
Understanding and Tolerance (May 2022)
Statement on Gun Violence and Hate Crimes Against People of Color (May 2022)
Statement of Opposition to Florida Draft Rule Banning Gender Affirming Care for Adolescents (November 2022)
Additionally, please see our previously released statement in collaboration with APA Division 44 below, where we highlight the psychosocial dangers of the outdated and poor quality research used by Florida Department of Health (DOH) to move forward with its ban on adolescent gender affirming care. Misuse of scientific information not only harms Florida’s LGBTQ+ population but also abuses the ethics of using scientific information for the benefit of people. Their ban clearly violates the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Principles of Medical Ethics as well as the APA Ethics Code.